Compare · updated 2026-08-31
03 · The field
juuna vsPostHog.
PostHog is the everything-platform: product analytics, session replay, feature flags, experiments, surveys and a warehouse. It is open source at the core and priced by usage, with a generous free tier. Teams that want one tool for all of it have a strong default there.
juuna is the opposite bet: a small analytics suite on infrastructure that is yours alone, at a price that does not move. This page is for deciding which bet fits.
Their case
Choose PostHog if…
- You want feature flags, A/B experiments or surveys in the same platform as analytics. juuna does none of those.
- Usage-based pricing suits you. At small volume PostHog can cost nothing.
- Open source and a hobby self-host option matter to you.
- Your team wants the whole surface area, and will use it.
Ours
Choose juuna if…
- You want a bill that reads the same every month.
- You want single-tenant isolation. PostHog Cloud is multi-tenant; juuna gives every customer their own machine and their own Postgres.
- You want a dashboard the whole team reads without training: fourteen views, one tab bar, no query language.
- You want privacy handled by architecture rather than configuration: isolation, masking by default, scheduled pruning.
I
Side by side
- Product philosophy
- Small on purpose: analytics, nothing else
- Everything-platform: analytics + flags + experiments + surveys + more
- Hosting model
- A dedicated instance per customer
- Multi-tenant cloud (US/EU); hobby self-host for small scale
- Pricing model
- Flat: $29 / $79 / $199 per month
- Usage-based per product, with a free tier
- Session replay
- Included, masked by default, live-follow mode, bounded retention
- Included, with more debugging depth (console, network capture)
- Heatmaps
- Click, scroll and attention maps over real page captures
- Click maps via its toolbar
- Core Web Vitals
- Included, per page, daily p75s
- Included in web analytics
- Feature flags & experiments
- Not offered. Pair juuna with a flags tool you like
- First-class products
- Open source
- No
- Yes at the core
- Learning curve
- Read it on day one
- Real, and worth it if you use the breadth
II
The real difference
The choice is temperament as much as features. PostHog optimises for capability: more products, more knobs, more power, metered. juuna optimises for the opposite: fewer things, each finished, on hardware that is yours, at a price that is boring.
If your team will use flags, experiments and the warehouse, PostHog earns its complexity. If the questions you keep coming back to are what happened, to whom, how fast and where it breaks, juuna answers those with a fraction of the surface area and none of the metering.
§
Asked and answered
- Isn’t PostHog’s free tier cheaper than juuna?
- Often, yes. At small volume PostHog can cost nothing. The trade is structural: multi-tenant infrastructure, usage-based billing that wants watching, and a much larger product to hold in your head. juuna charges a flat $29 because what analytics will cost next month should be a number you already know.
- Does juuna do feature flags or A/B testing?
- No. juuna is analytics: what happens, to whom, how fast, and where it breaks down. Teams that need flags pair juuna with a dedicated flags tool.
- Is juuna’s session replay as capable as PostHog’s?
- It covers the core well: pixel-accurate rrweb recordings, a live-follow mode, masking by default, capped length and bounded retention. PostHog’s replay carries more debugging depth, including console logs and network capture. If deep-debug replay is your primary need, PostHog is ahead. juuna’s replay is built for safely watching real usage.
See it with your own traffic.
Flat plans, everything included. Checkout to live dashboard usually takes about ten minutes.