Alternatives

03 · The list

Alternatives toGoogle Analytics.

The strongest Google Analytics alternatives for small teams are lightweight, privacy-first tools: juuna, Plausible, Fathom, Umami and Matomo all replace GA4’s traffic reporting with a readable dashboard and no ads ecosystem, and PostHog replaces it with a full product platform.

One disclosure before the ranking: juuna is ours. The list is written to be useful anyway. Every claim about a rival is true and checkable, each entry says who should pick that tool, and where a rival is the better choice, the entry says so.

Last updated · 2026-08-31

I

The list

01

juuna

Ours · disclosed

juuna replaces the part of GA4 most teams actually use, traffic, sources, campaigns, realtime, funnels and retention, and adds what GA4 never had: session replay, click, scroll and attention heatmaps, and Core Web Vitals, in one dashboard with no query language. Every customer runs on a dedicated instance, your own server and your own Postgres, so the data never shares a machine with anyone.

Pick it if
You want GA4’s questions answered on sight, plus replay and heatmaps, with the data on hardware nobody else rents.
Pricing model
Flat: $29 / $79 / $199 per month, everything included on every plan.
The catch
Not open source and not self-hostable: juuna is sold only as a managed dedicated instance. If running it yourself is the requirement, pick Matomo or Umami below.
juuna vs Google Analytics

02

Plausible

Plausible is the archetype of the lightweight GA4 replacement: a script measured in hundreds of bytes, no cookies, open source under AGPL, and a dashboard you can read at a glance. It runs in a multi-tenant EU cloud, or you can self-host the Community Edition on your own terms.

Pick it if
Counting visits is the whole job and you want the lightest, cleanest tool that does it.
Pricing model
Tiered by monthly pageview volume; the self-hosted Community Edition is free.
The catch
Aggregate counting by design: no session replay, no heatmaps and no user-level analytics, so it cannot tell you what any individual user did.
juuna vs Plausible

03

Fathom

Fathom has sold simple, cookieless web stats on a single screen since before privacy-first analytics was a category. One script tag, a deliberately plain dashboard, and a company whose entire business is the subscription.

Pick it if
You want Plausible’s simplicity as a pure product, with nothing to host and no editions to weigh.
Pricing model
Tiered by monthly pageview volume, paid only.
The catch
Web stats only, and thinner reporting than GA4 on purpose: no replay, no heatmaps, and the current product is closed source, so there is no supported self-host path.
juuna vs Fathom

04

Umami

Umami is the self-hoster’s pick: MIT-licensed web analytics you run against your own database, with a clean dashboard and a small script. A hosted cloud exists for teams that want the tool without the ops.

Pick it if
You want to own the stack outright, licence included, and are happy operating what you own.
Pricing model
Free to self-host; the hosted cloud is priced by usage.
The catch
You are the operator: upgrades, backups and scaling land on you. And like the other lightweight tools, there is no replay and there are no heatmaps.
juuna vs Umami

05

Matomo

Matomo is the veteran, in production since 2007 as Piwik, and the closest thing on this list to a full GA replacement: campaigns, goals, ecommerce and user-level reporting. Self-host it under the GPL for free, or pay for the managed cloud.

Pick it if
You want GA4’s depth without Google, and have either the will to self-host or the budget for the cloud.
Pricing model
Free to self-host at the core; cloud priced by traffic; several features are paid add-ons.
The catch
Depth costs simplicity: it is a large product with a lot of surface, a serious self-host install is real server work, and features like heatmaps and session recording are sold separately.
juuna vs Matomo

06

PostHog

PostHog is the heavyweight: product analytics, session replay, feature flags, experiments and a warehouse in one platform, open source at the core, priced by usage with a generous free tier. As a GA4 replacement it is the most capable tool on this list, and the most to hold.

Pick it if
You are leaving GA4 because you outgrew it, not because it was too much.
Pricing model
Usage-based per product, with a free tier.
The catch
It is a platform, not a light tool: the surface area is large, the learning curve is real, and usage-based bills want watching.
juuna vs PostHog

II

Side by side

juuna
HostingA dedicated instance per customer
Pricing modelFlat: $29 / $79 / $199 per month
Session replayIncluded, masked by default
HeatmapsClick, scroll and attention
FunnelsIncluded
Open sourceNo
Plausible
HostingEU cloud, or self-host
Pricing modelTiered by pageviews; free self-host
Session replayNot offered
HeatmapsNot offered
FunnelsOn its higher tiers
Open sourceYes (AGPL)
Fathom
HostingIts multi-tenant cloud
Pricing modelTiered by pageviews
Session replayNot offered
HeatmapsNot offered
FunnelsEvents, not funnels
Open sourceNo
Umami
HostingSelf-host, or its cloud
Pricing modelFree self-host; cloud by usage
Session replayNot offered
HeatmapsNot offered
FunnelsBasic, in reports
Open sourceYes (MIT)
Matomo
HostingSelf-host, or its cloud
Pricing modelFree core; cloud by traffic
Session replayPaid add-on
HeatmapsPaid add-on
FunnelsPaid add-on
Open sourceYes (GPL)
PostHog
HostingMulti-tenant cloud; hobby self-host
Pricing modelUsage-based, free tier
Session replayIncluded, deeper debugging
HeatmapsClick maps via toolbar
FunnelsIncluded
Open sourceYes at the core

III

A straight answer

Which Google Analytics alternative avoids a cookie banner?

Plausible, Fathom and Umami count visitors without cookies or persistent identifiers, which is the cleanest position to defend. juuna sets no third-party cookies and uses no advertising identifiers; visitors are counted with a random first-party identifier that never crosses sites. Matomo can be configured to run cookieless.

Whether your jurisdiction requires a consent prompt for any of these is a question for your counsel. What every tool here removes is GA4’s structural entanglement with the ads ecosystem, which is where the hard consent questions come from.

§

Asked and answered

Why leave Google Analytics at all?
GA4 is free, capable and built for advertising. The common reasons to leave follow from exactly that: product questions take a custom Exploration to answer, your data is processed inside Google’s cloud, and the tool’s centre of gravity is ads rather than product. If none of that bothers you, staying is a legitimate answer.
Which alternative can import my GA4 history?
Several tools on this list have offered Google Analytics importers, and what they cover changes, so check the current state before planning around one. juuna does not import GA4 history: the tag starts collecting the day it goes in, and teams usually run both side by side for a few weeks before turning one off.
Do lightweight alternatives undercount compared to GA4?
Usually the opposite. GA4’s script is among the most widely blocked on the web, so it misses much of any privacy-conscious audience. Small first-party scripts with no ad tech are blocked less often. No tool counts visitors who block everything, and none should.
Can I keep Google Ads running without GA4?
If your ads pipeline depends on GA4’s conversion import and audiences, keep GA4 for that; nothing on this list replaces it. Plenty of teams run GA4 for the ads plumbing and one of these tools for the questions people actually ask. The tags coexist.
Is there a free alternative on this list?
Yes. Plausible, Umami and Matomo are free if you self-host them, bringing your own server and your own time, and PostHog’s cloud has a genuinely usable free tier. Free the way GA4 is free, with someone else’s business model paying the bill, is a model only Google runs at this scale.

Decide with your own data.

Flat plans, everything included. Checkout to live dashboard usually takes about ten minutes.

One tag to install · read the docs